Targeting Vulnerability: Analyzing the Prevalence, Strategies, and Impact of Scams on Seniors
Charles Kim
Gal Senior Care Foundation | Download the full paper here
10 July 2024
ABSTRACT
The growing prevalence of financial scams targeting seniors has contributed to increased vulnerability within this demographic, leading to significant financial losses and psychological harm. This report investigates current scams targeting seniors and explores risk factors that may increase the probability of financial exploitation. Moreover, the dominant strategies used by scammers, such as emotional manipulation and impersonation of authority, are analyzed to understand their effectiveness in exploiting seniors. Previous research has demonstrated that seniors are targeted due to their perceived vulnerability and isolation; however, this report expands on existing literature by incorporating detailed statistics from countries such as Canada and the USA. These statistics highlight the severity of senior-targeted scams, including the monetary losses, the percentage of seniors affected, underreporting rates, and demographic breakdowns. We use this data to assess the risk factors associated with each scam and to examine the mental health impacts on defrauded seniors. Our findings indicate that while existing measures address some aspects of the issue, a more comprehensive approach is required to protect seniors from financial exploitation.
INTRODUCTION
The rising prevalence of fraud on seniors is leaving many seniors in peril, threatening to deprive them of their resources, their autonomy and trust. Elderly financial fraud is a substantial problem and is anticipated to become worse with the aging of the overall population (Nguyen et al., 2021). As the world becomes more innovative and technologically advanced, so are criminals equally devising new means and techniques to perfect their criminality. Therefore, it is paramount to understand the various methods criminals use and offer suitable measures to avert the problem. Financial victimization of the elderly primarily encompasses crimes such as scams and financial fraud. Examples include identity fraud, investment fraud and mass marketing scams among others (Schmidt et al., 2021). Although people of all ages can be victims of fraud regardless of their cognitive status, research indicates that the elderly population are the most vulnerable and ideal victims globally (Yu et al., 2023). Essentially, the elderly citizens are disproportionately targeted by scam attempts compared to other age groups. Moreover, financial fraud happens to be the most momentous and recurrent form of crime that seniors are subjected to.
For instance, conservative estimates suggest that the annual financial loss by senior financial fraud victims is at least $2.9 billion in the United States alone (DeLieme et al., 2018). Anderson (2013) further claims that approximately 9.1% of the population aged over 55 become victims of financial fraud every year. Similarly, it is estimated that 4.0% of seniors aged 75 + fall victim to fraud. Another meta-analysis study revealed that overall elderly financial fraud prevalence was 5.6% among community residents (Factora, 2021). Moreover, a study of financial fraud between age groups of (16-84) in 2021 indicates that seniors aged above 65 years were more exposed to card/credit fraud with a rate of 7.4% while 20-64 years represented 7.0% and the youngest age group (16-19) years encompassed 2.6 % (Spreng et al., 2021). The report points out that vulnerability has increased especially among seniors since 2017. This provides some sobering indication of the potential scope of the problem that calls for distinct measures that will constantly protect seniors based on the methods used to defraud them.
LITERATURE REVIEW
According to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), reports of suspicious activity involving seniors totalled approximately $1.7 billion dollars in 2019. In that same year, there were 63,500 reports of suspicious activity involving elderly victims, which was four times the amount of reports filed in 2013. Moreover, an outside analysis of financial fraud involving seniors estimated losses to be in the range of $2.9 billion to $36.5 billion in any given year (NCOA, 2021).
In this literature review, the research explores information relevant to financial fraud involving seniors. The literature review covered the following aspects and theories about fraud/financial exploitation of the elderly.
-
- ● Scam Methods utilized by Swindlers
-
- ● Risk Factors among Seniors
The first step involved in understanding and intervening against financial fraud involving seniors is determining its prevalence and incidence. However, accurate estimates regarding the prevalence and incidence of elderly financial fraud will likely remain unknown as many senior citizens are unwilling to report their experiences with financial fraud to relevant authorities (Nguyen et al., 2021). For example, the CFPB (2019) revealed that no more than 27% of known fraud victims admitted their victimization. Furthermore, the difference between various forms of fraud may also be a factor to the underreporting aspect since financial fraud is not a single concept but instead comprises a broad scale of unique crimes.
Scam Methods
a) Government Imposter Scams
Government impostors call unsuspecting victims and pretend to be from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), Social Security Administration, or Medicare (Yu et al., 2023). They may say you have unpaid taxes and threaten arrest or deportation if payment is not sent immediately. Additionally, they may state your Social Security or Medicare benefits are in danger of being cut off if you don’t provide personal identifying information. Moreover, government impersonators often “spoof” the actual phone numbers of the government agency or call from the same zip code.
The CRA imposter scam persists as one of the most prevalent scam strategies today. These types of scams are particularly damaging to elders, as the caller typically indicates that all social security benefits will be disabled if the person who receives the phone call does not return the call or speak with a representative. Typically, these “CRA Agents” will utilize fake information, such as agent ID numbers and inform victims about amounts of money owed to the CRA that must be paid via wire transfer or gift cards.
Considering the prevalence of the government imposter scam, it is important to note that authentic government agencies will never call to request personal information while also demanding money and threatening to suspend a person’s social security number. Additionally, government agencies will not call, email, text, or send direct messages to individuals requesting any form of payment on social media websites. To this point, there will never be a situation where a representative of a government agency will call a senior requesting funds in the form of gift cards, wire transfers, cryptocurrency, or cash payments.
b) The Grandparent Scam
The grandparent scam is simple and devious since it utilizes an asset found in most seniors: their hearts (Schmidt et al., 2021). Essentially, scammers will place a call to a senior and say something along the lines of: “Hi Grandma, do you know who this is?” When the unsuspecting grandparent guesses the grandchild’s name, the scammer most sound like, the scammer has established a fake identity without having done any background research. Once “in,” the fake grandchild will ask for money to solve some unexpected
financial problem (overdue rent, car repairs, jail bond) and will beg the grandparents not to tell anyone. Since scammers request to be paid via gift cards or money transfers, which don’t always require identification to collect, the senior may have no way of seeing that money ever again.
Moreover, the perpetrators for these types of scams are usually able to gain access to consumers’ personal information by collecting data from social media or even by purchasing the information from thieves who specialize in cybercrime and theft. The scammers are able to spoof the caller ID and make it appear as if the phone number is coming from a trusted source or a phone number that seems similar to the grandchild’s.
c) Computer Tech Support Scams
Computer technical support scams prey on people’s lack of knowledge about computers and cybersecurity (Burton et al., 2022). A pop-up message or blank screen usually appears on a computer or phone to inform you that your device is “compromised” and requires “fixing”. When you call the support number for help, the scammer may either request remote access to your computer and/or that you pay a service fee to have it repaired. The National Council on Aging (2021) found that seniors who fell for this scam lost an average of $500 each to computer tech support scams in 2018.
These types of scams are particularly devastating to the elderly population as the tech scammers ensure that they target and prey on those who know little about computers and technology (Burton et al., 2022). The tech support scam wishes for victims who may easily fall prey to believing that there are “authentic” issues such as viruses on their computer. This is done to allow the perpetrator to gain access to the victim’s computer via remote access in which a “diagnostic test” is completed. Then, the scammer will take advantage of their lack of knowledge and charge for “services rendered” by requesting payment to be sent via gift card purchases, cash cards, money transfer applications, or wire transactions. It is important to remember this is all done for a problem that never existed in the first place.
In some instances, the perpetrator will gain remote access to the victim’s computer and place malware software on the computer that is able to recognize key-strokes. In doing so, the perpetrator will wait for the victim to access their banking information, or direct them on how to send them payments in an attempt to take over the victim’s account.
d) Sweepstakes & Lottery Scams
This simple scam capitalizes on the notion that “there’s no such thing as a free lunch” (Factora, 2021). Essentially, scammers inform their targets that they have won a lottery or sweepstakes of some kind and thereby require a form of payment to unlock the supposed prize. Furthermore, the perpetrators will request for the money to be sent via wire transfer, gift card purchases, or cash transaction applications. Oftentimes, seniors will be sent a fake check that they can deposit into their bank account. In the time taken for the (fake) check to be rejected, the scammers will simply collect the money for the supposed fees or taxes on the prize and disappear. For sweepstakes and lottery scams, the initial contact with the victim usually consists of a phone call, email, social media notification, or a letter to the potential victim that they are the winner of a “prize/lottery.” These types of scams are the epitome of “if something is too good to be true it probably is”.
e) Robocalls/Phone Scams
In recent years, these types of phone calls have become a daily occurrence, thereby becoming a serious nuisance to most (Nguyen et al., 2021). Robocalls take advantage of sophisticated phone technology to dial large numbers of households from anywhere in the world. Robocallers use a variety of tactics to cheat their victims. Some may claim that a warranty is expiring on their car/electronic product and payment is needed to renew it. One popular robocall is the “Can you hear me?” call, where the scammer hangs up after recording the person’s voice replying “yes”, thus obtaining a voice signature to authorize unwanted charges on items like stolen credit cards. (NCOA, 2021).
According to the NCOA (2021), robocalls accounted for over 200,000 complaints each year, which represents about 60% of their total complaint volume. Moreover, 48 billion robocalls were placed in 2018 just in the United States alone (Nguyen et al., 2021). Robocalls typically consist of claims that the potential victim’s debit card information has been sold illegally, they are a victim of identity theft, or there has been suspicious activity on their bank account. Furthermore, robocalls are often used in CRS scams, vehicle warranty scams, and sometimes in tech support scams.
f) Romance Scams
As more people utilize the Internet for dating, con artists see an opportunity to find their next victim (DeLieme et al., 2018). Romance scammers create elaborate fake profiles, often on social media, and exploit seniors’ loneliness for money. In some cases, romance scammers may (or pretend to) be overseas and request money to pay for visas, medical emergencies, and travel expenses to come visit the person. Moreover, romance scammers can loot a large sum of money from a senior over time by deliberately maintaining the romantic relationship for as long as possible. The FTC found that in 2019 alone, seniors lost nearly $84 million to romance scams. In 2020, the number shot up to $139 million. In the past five years, victims have lost more than $1.3 billion to such scams, which is greater than any other category of financial fraud tracked by the Federal Trade Commission.
g) Internet and Email Fraud
While using the Internet is a valuable skill at any age, the slower speed of adoption among some seniors causes them to be easier targets for automated internet scams that are ubiquitous on the web and email programs (Shang et al., 2022). Pop-up browser windows simulating virus scanning software will fool victims into either downloading a fake anti-virus program (at a substantial cost) or an actual virus that will open up whatever information is on the user’s computer to scammers. Their unfamiliarity with the less visible aspects of browsing the web (firewalls and built-in virus protection) makes seniors especially susceptible to such traps. Moreover, phishing emails and text messages may look like they are sent from a company that can be trusted. Additionally, these emails request your personal information, such as a log-in or Social Security number to verify your account or ask that you update your credit card payment. Then, they can utilize the information to steal a senior’s personal and financial information. (NCOA, 2021)
h) Charity Scams
Charity scams rely on seniors’ goodwill to pocket money that these scammers claim to be raising for a good cause (Burton et al., 2022). Some scammers may utilize a name similar to a legitimate charity. Moreover, they often capitalize on current events, such as natural disasters, and may set up a fundraising page on a crowdsourcing site that does not have the means of investigating fraud. Additionally, charity scammers may insist on donating immediately with payment methods such as gift cards or money transfers (NCOA, 2021).
Risk Factors
a) Overly Trusting Nature
An overly trusting nature has been considered a crucial factor in a senior’s weakness to fraud (DeLieme et al., 2018). Encouraging the elderly’s loyalty, affection, and trust as a key method to hook them into scams and financial exploitation has been regularly employed by scammers. Reports have indicated that elderly citizens are commonly more gullible than their younger colleagues and give primacy to emotionally profound goals (Nguyen et al., 2021). This predisposition for seniors to overly trust others, particularly strangers, causes them to be more susceptible to financial fraud.
Furthermore, seniors’ elevated amounts of trust for strangers may indicate tangible changes in their brain circuitry. Castle et al. (2012) assessed the neural foundation of trust and noticed an indication of age-related variations in the anterior insula. The seniors demonstrated subdued activation of the anterior insula to unfamiliar faces, while the younger counterparts did not show such a weakened response. The findings imply that variations in neural circuitry may contribute to the elderly’s vulnerability to financial fraud.
b) Psychological vulnerability
Seniors experiencing negative life events, low social needs fulfillment, or depression display a great psychological susceptibility to connect with others, which leaves them vulnerable to be pursued by con artists (Shang et al., 2022). For instance, Castle et al. (2012) observed that psychological susceptibility, which is described as a blend of poor fulfillment of social needs and depression, can longitudinally envisage new incidents of fraud with highly vulnerable people (namely seniors) showing a dual probability of being defrauded. A comparable study by Lichtenberg et al. (2013) also discovered that seniors with psychological susceptibility were roughly three times as prone to be victims of financial fraud, thus underscoring the significance of considering psychological weakness in establishing vulnerability to scams.
c) Social isolation
Social isolation is usually seen as a risk factor for fraud among the elderly since secluded seniors may engage with criminals in a misguided endeavour in an attempt to develop social connections (Factora, 2021). Research indicates that seniors who experience social seclusion are more projected to fall victim to telemarketing fraud (Spreng et al., 2021). Moreover, scammers may display untruthful concern for lonely seniors and establish “relationships” with them via the telephone to win their confidence and later lure them into the financial fraud setup.
Essentially, the elderly are considered ideal targets, as a large proportion of them live alone in the wake of the demise of a spouse and the subsequent seclusion may cause them to be more eager to interact with strangers. Case in point, seniors living by themselves are more easily pursued by swindlers since they habitually do not receive effective care and/or guidance from family members.
d) Risk-taking
Financial risk-taking actions may enhance the probability of financial fraud victimization among the elderly, as victims of fraud are highly prone to be risk-takers (Factora, 2021). To elaborate, research indicates that seniors display diminished negative awakening to expected loss. Therefore, they may engage in perilous financial decision-making and subsequently partake in even more poor choices that may lead to them being attacked by scammers. Consequently, these age-associated changes raise the probability of financial fraud involving seniors due to declines in anticipated damages or losses.
Conclusion of Literature Review
There is consensus in the literature that shows how senior mistreatment is becoming a major crisis as the world’s population ages. Additionally, the literature provides insights into scam strategies utilized by swindlers while explaining the risk factors that increase the susceptibility of seniors to financial fraud. As such, it is clear that there are barriers that still need to be overcome.
Some barriers remain that can be addressed by (1) providing resources in rural areas for alleged victims; (2) providing better assessment tools for frontline emergency personnel workers to quickly assess and more effectively help alleged victims; and (3) providing educational opportunities to help potential victims and their caregivers recognize the signs of mistreatment and how to protect themselves from different forms of financial fraud.
FINDINGS
The research uncovered several key aspects of senior financial exploitation that underscore the vulnerability of seniors in the modern digital landscape. One of the most interesting findings is the pervasive nature of scams targeting seniors, which have evolved alongside technological advancements. Seniors are particularly susceptible to online scams due to their lower levels of digital literacy compared to younger populations. This digital divide leaves them at a disadvantage, making it easier for scammers to employ tactics such as phishing emails, fraudulent websites, and deceptive online ads that prey on their lack of familiarity with digital security protocols.
Moreover, the study revealed that the tactics used by scammers are becoming increasingly sophisticated and manipulative. Scammers often exploit emotional triggers, such as fear, urgency, or empathy, to manipulate seniors into parting with their money or personal information. For example, many scams involve impersonating authority figures, such as government officials or law enforcement, to create a sense of legitimacy and pressure the victim into complying with their demands. The research highlighted that this strategy is particularly effective among seniors, who may be more trusting and respectful of authority figures, making them more likely to fall victim to such schemes.
Another critical finding is the psychological impact of financial fraud on seniors. Beyond the financial losses, the emotional and mental health consequences are significant. Many seniors experience feelings of shame, guilt, and anxiety after being scammed, which can lead to social withdrawal and a decline in overall well-being. The study found that the stigma associated with being a victim of fraud often prevents seniors from reporting these crimes, further isolating them and allowing the perpetrators to continue their fraudulent activities unchecked.
The research also identified specific demographic factors that contribute to the heightened risk of fraud among seniors. For instance, seniors living alone or those with cognitive impairments are more likely to be targeted by scammers. The study found that these individuals are less likely to have a support system that could help them identify and avoid scams. Additionally, seniors who are financially independent but unfamiliar with modern financial practices, such as online banking, are at a higher risk of being deceived by fraudulent schemes that appear legitimate.
Furthermore, the analysis of statistical data provided a clear picture of the scope and severity of elder financial exploitation. In Canada, it was found that a significant percentage of seniors are affected by fraud each year, with monetary losses reaching alarming levels. The data also showed that many cases go unreported, suggesting that the actual impact of senior scams is likely much higher than official figures indicate. Comparative analysis with the United States revealed similar trends, with elderly individuals being disproportionately targeted compared to younger age groups.
Lastly, the research emphasized the critical role of community and institutional support in mitigating the risks of elder financial exploitation. It was found that when seniors have access to education, resources, and strong support networks, they are better equipped to recognize and resist fraudulent schemes. However, the findings also highlighted that these protective measures are not uniformly available across different regions and demographics, leaving some seniors more vulnerable than others.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this research underscore the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to protect seniors from the increasing threat of financial scams. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, so do the tactics employed by scammers. This makes it imperative that both seniors and those who support them remain vigilant and informed. The research highlights that seniors are particularly vulnerable due to factors such as lower digital literacy, social isolation, and heightened respect for authority figures, which scammers exploit to their advantage.
One of the most critical takeaways from this study is the profound psychological impact of financial fraud on seniors. Beyond the financial losses, the emotional toll can be devastating, leading to feelings of shame, guilt, and a deterioration in mental health. This not only affects the well-being of the victims but also exacerbates the issue by discouraging reporting, thereby allowing fraudulent activities to continue unchecked. The research makes it clear that addressing the emotional and psychological aftermath of fraud is just as important as preventing it in the first place.
To combat these challenges, education and support systems are vital. The Gal Senior Care Foundation (GSC Foundation) plays a crucial role in this regard by providing seniors with the necessary tools and knowledge to recognize and resist scams. However, the findings suggest that more needs to be done to ensure these resources are accessible to all seniors, regardless of their geographic location or socio-economic status. The research emphasizes the importance of community involvement and the need for ongoing educational initiatives that adapt to the changing nature of scams.
In addition to education, the findings point to the need for stronger institutional protections and reporting mechanisms. Seniors must be encouraged to report instances of fraud without fear of embarrassment or stigma, and there should be clear and supportive channels for doing so. This requires a coordinated effort between government agencies, financial institutions, and community organizations to create a safer environment for seniors. The research also suggests that future efforts should focus on identifying and addressing the specific demographic factors that increase the risk of fraud among seniors. Tailored interventions that consider the unique vulnerabilities of different groups within the senior population will be more effective in preventing exploitation.
In conclusion, protecting seniors from financial exploitation is not only a matter of safeguarding their finances but also preserving their dignity, independence, and mental health. The findings of this research serve as a call to action for all stakeholders—families, communities, organizations like the GSC Foundation, and policymakers—to work together to create a more secure and supportive environment for our elderly population. By prioritizing education, enhancing support systems, and fostering a culture of vigilance and reporting, we can significantly reduce the incidence of elder financial fraud and help ensure that seniors can live their later years with the security and peace of mind they deserve.
REFERENCES
Nguyen, A. L., Mosqueda, L., Windisch, N., Weissberger, G., Axelrod, J., & Han, S. D. (2021). Perceived types, causes, and consequences of financial exploitation: narratives from older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 76(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab010
Schmidt, M. K., Stowell, N. F., Pacini, C., & Patterson, G. (2021). Senior financial exploitation through wills, trusts, and guardianship: basics, red flags and prevention measures. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1222–1240. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2021-0225
Yu, L., Mottola, G., Kieffer, C. N., Mascio, R., Valdes, O., Bennett, D. A., & Boyle, P. A. (2023). Vulnerability of older adults to government impersonation scams. JAMA Network Open, 6(9), e2335319. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35319
Factora, R. M. (2021). Methods to Protect Individuals from Financial Exploitation. In Springer eBooks (pp. 221–235). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67565-3_15
The National Council on Aging (NCOA). (2021). Get the facts on elder abuse. https://www.ncoa.org/article/get-the-facts-on-elder-abuse
DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2018). Financial fraud among older Americans: evidence and implications. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 75(4), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby151
Anderson, K. B. (2013). Consumer Fraud in the United States 2011: USA. The third FTC survey. https://www.ftc.gov/reports/consumer-fraud-united-states-2011-third-ftc-survey
Shang, Y., Wu, Z., Du, X., Jiang, Y., Ma, B., & Chi, M. (2022). The psychology of the internet fraud victimization of older adults: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912242
Spreng, R. N., Ebner, N. C., Levin, B. E., & Turner, G. R. (2021). Aging and financial exploitation risk. In Springer eBooks (pp. 55–73). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67565-3_5
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). (2019). Reporting of suspected elder financial exploitation by financial institutions, pp. 1-25. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/reporting-suspected-eld er-financial-exploitation-financial-institutions-update-2016-advisory-and-recommendatio ns/
Burton, A., Cooper, C., Dar, A., Mathews, L., & Tripathi, K. (2022). Exploring how, why and in what contexts older adults are at risk of financial cybercrime victimization: A realist review. Experimental Gerontology, 159, 111678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111678
Castle, E., Eisenberger, N. I., Seeman, T. E., Moons, W. G., Boggero, I. A., Grinblatt, M. S., & Taylor, S. E. (2012) Neural and behavioral bases of age differences in perceptions of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(51), 20848–20852. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218518109
Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D. (2013) Is psychological vulnerability related to the experience of fraud in older adults? Clinical Gerontologist, 36(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2012.749323
